Canada's IKEA Sleep Score: 58 Out of 100 and Why We're Sleeping Below Average

Reading Time: 7 minutes

Corporate sleep surveys should always be read with a degree of scepticism. IKEA is a furniture company with a significant interest in selling bedroom products, and the GlobeScan collaboration produces research that, not coincidentally, tends to suggest people need better home environments to sleep well. That's not the same as saying the data is wrong, just that the framing benefits from some independent context.

With that said, IKEA's Life at Home Report is a fairly substantial international study, and Canada's 58/100 sleep score lines up reasonably well with what Canadian health surveys show independently. So the number is worth understanding, even if the commercial intent behind publishing it is obvious.

What Is the IKEA Sleep Score and How Was It Measured?

The IKEA Life at Home Report surveys adults across many countries annually, using GlobeScan as the independent research partner. The sleep score is a composite index based on self-reported measures including:

The 100-point scale is an aggregate of these dimensions. A score of 58 means that across all dimensions, Canadians on average rate themselves at 58% of what the researchers define as optimal sleep health. The global average in the report has typically been around 62-63, placing Canada below but not dramatically so.

It is worth noting that this is a self-reported survey, not a clinical sleep study. Self-reported sleep quality and actual polysomnographic sleep quality correlate moderately but not perfectly. People who perceive their sleep as poor often do have measurable sleep disruption, but the scale and ranking are comparative rather than clinical.

Why Canada Scored 58: The Key Drivers

The IKEA report identified several factors that pulled Canada's score below the global average. These align with what Statistics Canada and the Canadian Sleep Society have documented independently:

Stress as the Dominant Factor

Stress was the most commonly cited barrier to sleep in the Canadian survey sample. Work pressure, financial anxiety, and family responsibilities combined to keep a significant portion of respondents' minds active at bedtime. This maps directly onto what sleep researchers call "cognitive hyperarousal," the primary mechanism driving prolonged sleep onset and middle-of-the-night waking in insomnia.

Canada's relatively high-pressure work culture, long commuting times in major urban centres, and the cost-of-living pressures that have intensified in the 2020s all contribute to this. A person who has spent two hours commuting, arrives home to family demands, and then spends the evening worrying about a looming deadline has a significant arousal burden to overcome at bedtime.

Screen Use Before Bed

The IKEA data found high rates of device use in the hour before bed among Canadian respondents. The evidence on this is somewhat more nuanced than it's often presented. The light exposure from screens (particularly blue-spectrum light) can suppress melatonin production at light intensities and exposure durations typical of evening device use. The content is often at least as disruptive as the light: social media, news, and email all maintain cognitive engagement that competes with sleep onset.

Sleep Environment Quality

A significant percentage of Canadian respondents rated their sleep environment as uncomfortable, specifically citing noise, light, and temperature as issues. Canada's climate creates specific challenges here. During winter, indoor heating creates dry, warm conditions that many people find uncomfortable for sleep. Core body temperature needs to drop to initiate sleep, and a warm bedroom makes this harder. During summer, air conditioning access varies significantly across income levels.

The Broader Canadian Sleep Context

IKEA's 58/100 doesn't stand alone. Statistics Canada's Canadian Community Health Survey has consistently found that approximately 43% of Canadians aged 18-64 report sleeping less than the recommended 7-9 hours per night, with 13% reporting severe sleep difficulties. These figures have been relatively stable for over a decade.

Canadian sleep data also shows meaningful regional variation. British Columbia and Quebec have historically reported better self-rated sleep than Ontario and Alberta in survey data. Whether this reflects actual differences in sleep quality or differences in how people rate their experience is hard to disentangle, but the pattern is consistent across surveys.

What the IKEA Data Doesn't Capture

A few things worth noting about the limitations of a corporate sleep survey:

It captures perception, not physiology. Self-reported sleep quality is a real measure of something, but it's not the same as clinical sleep assessment. The 58/100 score reflects how Canadians feel about their sleep, which matters, but it can't tell us about sleep architecture, apnea rates, or objective sleep quality.

It skews toward people who can participate in an online survey. The respondent pool inevitably overrepresents people with internet access, leisure time to answer surveys, and a level of literacy and engagement that excludes marginalized groups who often have the worst sleep health.

The environment-focused framing benefits the seller. The report consistently emphasises bedroom environment factors, which makes sense for a company that sells bedroom furniture. Stress, healthcare access, and socioeconomic factors are acknowledged but not as prominently featured. Both sets of factors are real; the emphasis in commercial research tends to reflect what the commissioning organisation wants you to buy.

What Actually Helps Canadian Sleepers

Setting aside the commercial framing, the interventions supported by independent sleep research do include some sleep environment improvements alongside the more cognitively-oriented strategies:

Bedroom temperature: Cooling the room to 16-19 degrees Celsius (62-66 Fahrenheit) before sleep is among the most consistently supported environmental interventions for sleep onset and slow-wave sleep. This is within Canada's climate reality for many months of the year, but requires attention in winter when indoor heating keeps rooms warmer than ideal.

Light management: Blackout curtains or a sleep mask have genuine evidence for reducing light-related sleep disruption. This is a lower-cost intervention that IKEA and independent research both accurately identify as helpful.

Consistent sleep-wake timing: The single most supported individual sleep health behaviour across all the research literature. More impactful than any product purchase.

Sleep surface adequacy: A mattress that creates pressure points, sleeps hot, or transfers motion significantly disrupts sleep. This is a real factor, not simply sales messaging, and it's one that's worth addressing if other fundamentals are already in order.

Shop: Explore The Full Mattress Range